esxDOS BBS — 128k editor

Re: 128k editor

null@example.com (aowen) — Sat, 26 May 2018 19:39:32 +0000

Xalior wrote:

Now possible with shinynew ESXDOS 0.8.8 and the new .128 command.
-Dx

Actually that doesn't make it safe to use the 128 editor. You can still invoke the TR-DOS traps if you are unlucky. But there is now a solution if you are willing to swap your machine's ROM: https://zx.itch.io/derbyplusplus

Re: 128k editor

null@example.com (Luzie) — Fri, 25 May 2018 17:36:35 +0000

Xalior wrote:

Now possible with shinynew ESXDOS 0.8.8 and the new .128 command.
-Dx

You mean 0.8.6 - right?

Re: 128k editor

null@example.com (Xalior) — Fri, 25 May 2018 11:55:59 +0000

Now possible with shinynew ESXDOS 0.8.8 and the new .128 command.

-Dx

Re: 128k editor

null@example.com (Luzie) — Sun, 08 May 2016 23:01:55 +0000

Hi,

it´s not possible, have a look here:

http://board.esxdos.org/viewtopic.php?id=60

128k editor

null@example.com (baltasarq) — Thu, 24 Mar 2016 10:16:34 +0000

ESXDos is unable to work in 128k editor for BASIC
I suspect this is something related to being easier to support the 48k editor with access to 128k memory (RESIdos does the same thing).
But it is anyway uncomfortable to need to remember the key combinations for commamds, being myself an all-time 128k user. Can this be fixed?