<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<title type="html"><![CDATA[esxDOS BBS — 128k editor]]></title>
	<link rel="self" href="https://board.esxdos.org/extern.php?action=feed&amp;tid=65&amp;type=atom" />
	<updated>2018-05-26T19:39:32Z</updated>
	<generator>PunBB</generator>
	<id>https://board.esxdos.org/viewtopic.php?id=65</id>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: 128k editor]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://board.esxdos.org/viewtopic.php?pid=854#p854" />
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<div class="quotebox"><cite>Xalior wrote:</cite><blockquote><p>Now possible with shinynew ESXDOS 0.8.8 and the new .128 command.</p><p>-Dx</p></blockquote></div><p>Actually that doesn&#039;t make it safe to use the 128 editor. You can still invoke the TR-DOS traps if you are unlucky. But there is now a solution if you are willing to swap your machine&#039;s ROM: <a href="https://zx.itch.io/derbyplusplus">https://zx.itch.io/derbyplusplus</a></p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[aowen]]></name>
				<uri>https://board.esxdos.org/profile.php?id=168</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2018-05-26T19:39:32Z</updated>
			<id>https://board.esxdos.org/viewtopic.php?pid=854#p854</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: 128k editor]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://board.esxdos.org/viewtopic.php?pid=853#p853" />
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<div class="quotebox"><cite>Xalior wrote:</cite><blockquote><p>Now possible with shinynew ESXDOS 0.8.8 and the new .128 command.</p><p>-Dx</p></blockquote></div><p>You mean 0.8.6 - right?</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[Luzie]]></name>
				<uri>https://board.esxdos.org/profile.php?id=157</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2018-05-25T17:36:35Z</updated>
			<id>https://board.esxdos.org/viewtopic.php?pid=853#p853</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: 128k editor]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://board.esxdos.org/viewtopic.php?pid=851#p851" />
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Now possible with shinynew ESXDOS 0.8.8 and the new .128 command.</p><p>-Dx</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[Xalior]]></name>
				<uri>https://board.esxdos.org/profile.php?id=307</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2018-05-25T11:55:59Z</updated>
			<id>https://board.esxdos.org/viewtopic.php?pid=851#p851</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: 128k editor]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://board.esxdos.org/viewtopic.php?pid=221#p221" />
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Hi,</p><p>it´s not possible, have a look here:</p><p><a href="http://board.esxdos.org/viewtopic.php?id=60">http://board.esxdos.org/viewtopic.php?id=60</a></p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[Luzie]]></name>
				<uri>https://board.esxdos.org/profile.php?id=157</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2016-05-08T23:01:55Z</updated>
			<id>https://board.esxdos.org/viewtopic.php?pid=221#p221</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[128k editor]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://board.esxdos.org/viewtopic.php?pid=213#p213" />
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>ESXDos is unable to work in 128k editor for BASIC<br />I suspect this is something related to being easier to support the 48k editor with access to 128k memory (RESIdos does the same thing). <br />But it is anyway uncomfortable to need to remember the key combinations for commamds, being myself an all-time 128k user. Can this be fixed?</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[baltasarq]]></name>
				<uri>https://board.esxdos.org/profile.php?id=215</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2016-03-24T10:16:34Z</updated>
			<id>https://board.esxdos.org/viewtopic.php?pid=213#p213</id>
		</entry>
</feed>
