<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title><![CDATA[esxDOS BBS — minimum ROM stubs for virtual tape support]]></title>
		<link>https://board.esxdos.org/viewtopic.php?id=41</link>
		<atom:link href="https://board.esxdos.org/extern.php?action=feed&amp;tid=41&amp;type=rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<description><![CDATA[The most recent posts in minimum ROM stubs for virtual tape support.]]></description>
		<lastBuildDate>Tue, 25 Nov 2014 20:19:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>PunBB</generator>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: minimum ROM stubs for virtual tape support]]></title>
			<link>https://board.esxdos.org/viewtopic.php?pid=144#p144</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>I think I have it working but it&#039;s hard to tell as I&#039;m getting errors with the original ROM in Fuse when I&#039;m trying to load tapes. I&#039;m going to test against the last stable release of 0.8.5. Could be a Fuse thing, or a 0.8.6beta4 bug.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (aowen)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Tue, 25 Nov 2014 20:19:51 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://board.esxdos.org/viewtopic.php?pid=144#p144</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: minimum ROM stubs for virtual tape support]]></title>
			<link>https://board.esxdos.org/viewtopic.php?pid=143#p143</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Perfect. Thanks!</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (aowen)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2014 22:48:28 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://board.esxdos.org/viewtopic.php?pid=143#p143</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: minimum ROM stubs for virtual tape support]]></title>
			<link>https://board.esxdos.org/viewtopic.php?pid=142#p142</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<div class="quotebox"><cite>aowen wrote:</cite><blockquote><p>I need more space for new features in the next major version of SE Basic IV so I&#039;m looking at dropping native tape support and including only enough code for esxDOS&#039;s virtual tape support. Any tips on which bits of the ROM need to be left intact?</p></blockquote></div><p>From a quick look:</p><p>$04c6: out entry point<br />$04c9: out exit point in case there is no .tap file attached<br />$1f80: out exit point in case there is a problem loading the tape emulator overlay file</p><p>$0562: in entry point<br />$0564: in exit point in case there is no .tap file attached</p><p>Hope this helps.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (lordcoxis)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2014 16:59:54 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://board.esxdos.org/viewtopic.php?pid=142#p142</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[minimum ROM stubs for virtual tape support]]></title>
			<link>https://board.esxdos.org/viewtopic.php?pid=141#p141</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>I need more space for new features in the next major version of SE Basic IV so I&#039;m looking at dropping native tape support and including only enough code for esxDOS&#039;s virtual tape support. Any tips on which bits of the ROM need to be left intact?</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (aowen)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2014 22:09:17 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://board.esxdos.org/viewtopic.php?pid=141#p141</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
