esxDOS BBS — [bug] Unable to run .128 on a +2A +2e with DIVIDE2k20 esxdos 0.8.9

Re: [bug] Unable to run .128 on a +2A +2e with DIVIDE2k20 esxdos 0.8.9

null@example.com (TurBoss) — Wed, 04 Aug 2021 15:37:48 +0000

Hello!

I tried to replace some parts of my spectrum 128k +2B*
notice the B because I found not much ago

parts replaced:

ula
cpu
eprom dives3e roms
all the ram chips

same results

I have also tried a 2k21

this tested only on 0.8.9

Thanks

Re: [bug] Unable to run .128 on a +2A +2e with DIVIDE2k20 esxdos 0.8.9

null@example.com (Luzie) — Sat, 17 Jul 2021 09:58:03 +0000

TurBoss wrote:

I don't think is a esxdos bug anymore because pass-trough mode does the same...
Thanks

Hi,

thank you for the videos and this feedback. I don´t yet had time to do test on it myself.

Re: [bug] Unable to run .128 on a +2A +2e with DIVIDE2k20 esxdos 0.8.9

null@example.com (TurBoss) — Fri, 16 Jul 2021 15:55:05 +0000

I don't think is a esxdos bug anymore because pass-trough mode does the same...

Thanks

Re: [bug] Unable to run .128 on a +2A +2e with DIVIDE2k20 esxdos 0.8.9

null@example.com (TurBoss) — Mon, 12 Jul 2021 21:23:09 +0000

and 0.89 = https://youtu.be/pyTihhaSpkM

sorry had to do a seccond post to add a seccond link

Re: [bug] Unable to run .128 on a +2A +2e with DIVIDE2k20 esxdos 0.8.9

null@example.com (TurBoss) — Mon, 12 Jul 2021 21:21:39 +0000

hello,

Ive made 2 videos of how 0.88 and 0.89 does

0.88 = https://youtu.be/WRweGRLhPfo

Thanks

Re: [bug] Unable to run .128 on a +2A +2e with DIVIDE2k20 esxdos 0.8.9

null@example.com (Luzie) — Mon, 12 Jul 2021 11:32:56 +0000

TurBoss wrote:

hello,

it gives me a 48k basic
> on 0.8.7 .128 command just leaved me on a 48k basic

Thanks

Hi,

from here: http://board.esxdos.org/viewtopic.php?pid=1573#p1573

esxDOS v0.8.8 has been officially released. Grab it at http://www.esxdos.org/files/esxdos088.zip.
...
Changelog
...
[10/04/2020] Commands: Fixed .128 command which got broken in v0.8.7 (lordcoxis + reported by nagydani)
...

Re: [bug] Unable to run .128 on a +2A +2e with DIVIDE2k20 esxdos 0.8.9

null@example.com (TurBoss) — Sun, 11 Jul 2021 16:05:28 +0000

hello,

it gives me a 48k basic

> on 0.8.7 .128 command just leaved me on a 48k basic

Thanks

Re: [bug] Unable to run .128 on a +2A +2e with DIVIDE2k20 esxdos 0.8.9

null@example.com (Luzie) — Sun, 11 Jul 2021 07:13:51 +0000

I have no idea yet. But if you back-downgrade your DIVIDE2K20 to 0.8.7 ... the .128 command works again?

[bug] Unable to run .128 on a +2A +2e with DIVIDE2k20 esxdos 0.8.9

null@example.com (TurBoss) — Fri, 09 Jul 2021 21:11:50 +0000

Hello,

Just upgraded a esxdos 0.8.7 to 0.8.9 on DIVIDE2K20

on 0.8.7 .128 command just leaved me on a 48k basic

when i did the upgrade the .128 command runs tries to boot
the 128 loader menu but gets stuk trying to detect logic units

I was only able to do this on a DIVIDE2K14 0.8.8 (broken now)

Thanks
EDIT:
> I was only able to do this on a DIVIDE2K14 0.8.8 (broken now)
whats broken is the interface not esxdos